On June 20, the State Administration of Work Safety released the "2014 Safety Science and Technology Innovation Guide." As someone with a strong professional interest in safety, I have thoroughly reviewed the topics outlined in this guide. The document covers 151 major areas, with over 600 sub-topics, which essentially span all current production fields in China and are closely related to the technologies we use daily in our work.
When looking at these small but critical technical details, it's clear that many of them pose real challenges in our safety management practices. These issues are often confusing and hard to address. However, the state has now officially recognized these key technical problems as research priorities, providing us with clear guidance on where to focus our technological innovation efforts.
Identifying the problem is half the battle. To effectively tackle these complex issues, as a manager in business and safety production, I believe we must adopt what I call the "three dissatisfactions" in safety technology innovation.
First, we should not be satisfied with the current technical conditions and operational procedures set out in published safety regulations. Instead, we should deeply analyze the relationship between these regulations and real-world problems. We need to identify and understand the shortcomings in existing safety standards, and incorporate these into our research. This approach helps us pinpoint the core of the issue without overemphasizing the level of protection provided by current measures.
Second, we should not be satisfied with the safety distances specified in current regulations. Reducing these distances to an optimal level is essential for improving overall safety. For example, the national regulations require a 500-meter exclusion zone around gas stations, which means a large area of land must be reserved. This can significantly increase the cost of implementing new energy solutions. Similarly, in seismic exploration, the safe distance for open-air explosions is 120 meters, and 60 meters in wells. In mountainous regions, such distances may be impractical due to terrain complexity. By redefining safe well depths and using better detonation techniques, we reduced the required distance to 30 meters, greatly enhancing both safety and efficiency.
Third, we should not be satisfied with the occupational hazards and risk levels listed in the regulations. These hazards are always harmful to human health. In safe production, we should strengthen our research through collaboration and knowledge sharing, adopting more advanced technologies to further reduce risks and exposure levels.
In short, if we maintain a mindset of continuous improvement and remain dissatisfied with the status quo, focusing on safety distances, hazardous factor concentrations, and procedural flaws, we can drive meaningful innovation in safety production. Through gradual progress, we will eventually achieve significant breakthroughs in solving the safety challenges faced by enterprises. This will provide strong technical support for sustainable and safe development.
(Commenter Wu Yangyun)
Supporting Plate Sphere For Ball Valve
Supporting Plate Sphere For Ball Valve,Spray Coating Sphere,Trunnion Sphere For Ball Valve,Spray Sphere For Ball Valve
Antong Valve Co.,Ltd , https://www.atvalveball.com